Something... and Half of Something: Dark Prince of Islam Redux

« So. They have their secrets | Main | Shabbat Shalom »

November 16, 2007

Dark Prince of Islam Redux

The best kept non-secret of Britain's Royal Family used to be their animosity towards the Jewish people and the State of Israel. They try to bury it, but as my father used to say... shit floats:

Senior aides to Britain’s Prince Charles said there is “no chance” the prince would ever visit Israel as such a visit would boost Israel’s international image. The aides wrote the comments, in August e-mails, after outgoing Israeli ambassador to Britain Zvi Heifetz extended an invitation to the prince via principal private secretary Sir Michael Peat and deputy private secretary Clive Alderton.

In e-mails to be published today in London by The Jewish Chronicle, Peat politely thanked Heifetz and said the prince “would love to come.” However, in a later e-mail Alderton sent to Peat, he complained that he was “being pursued.”

Alderton asked is it “safe to assume there is no chance of this visit ever actually happening?” Alderton noted, “Acceptance would make it hard to avoid the many ways in which Israel would want HRH [Prince Charles] to help burnish its international image. In which case, let’s agree a way to lower its expectations.”

Now... the best kept non-secret of the British Royal Family is its admiration and adulation of islam:

ISLAMABAD, Oct 31 (KUNA) -- Prince Charles Tuesday said that the world problems could be resolve by following Islamic teachings, as Islam is a religion of peace and brotherhood.

He said that clash of civilizations could be averted by following the teaching of Islam and Quraan.

This is, of course, the same Prince Charles who received an Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies Award in 2005 for his contribution to understanding Islam, and who traveled to America, to defend and promote Islam, and to encourage America to "share his fondness for Islam."


Prince Charles, Champion of Islam

The Prince wants us to "share his fondness for Islam?" Yeah well, piss off Prince. I have no fondness for terrorists and I have no desire to revert to the 7th century either.

Let me tell you what terrorism is.

Terrorism is the the systematic use of terror as a means of coercion, the use of violence (as bombing) committed by groups in order to intimidate a population or government into granting their demands.

Prince Charles obviously views terrorists as "freedom fighters" and/or "militants" fighting oppression. Well Prince, why don't you tell that to the children of Beslan. Tell that to the teenagers in Israel blown up in a disco or a pizza parlor. Tell that to the 2,996 who died on 9/11, and the hundreds killed on a train in Spain. Tell that to the hundreds of Iraqis who were blown up in the street this year, oh, and the hundreds of your countrymen who died in the name of Islam.

The United States of America has done more to promote freedom throughout the world than any other country. We have sacrificed more and given more of ourselves, our people, our money and our time to stand up for freedom throughout the world. We will continue to do so, and we will never share your "fondness" for the monsters who killed those children in Beslan, who blew up the trains in Spain, who bomb pizzarias and buses in Israel, who flew planes into the WTC, and yes, who blew up your countrymen on July 11, 2005. These are the same people who are blowing up innocent Iraqis even as they try to rebuild their lives after Saddam.

Albert Einstein once said: "The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it."

The world is a dangerous place also because of the people who don't do evil but who make it easier for others to do it.

And that includes you Prince Charles, that includes you.

Posted by LindaSoG at November 16, 2007 06:57 AM


Comments

Why is it that while I was in Saudi Arabia, most (by far) of the English teachers I met over there were gay?

Why should I find it surprising that Arab men are always holding hands and women are completely excluded from public life?

Why am I not surprised that less than two years ago there were charges brought up against "Princey" Charles by a male member of his staff, and because Chuckley Charlie is a Royal, it is illegal to disclose the nature of those charges in the British media (the US media covered it, even Steven Colbert did a skit on it!)?

I have no problem with anyone's lifestyle, but the preposterous popularity of Islam with gays is disturbing. All I can say at this stage is that Charles' horse-faced wife is just another beard, and my suspicion is that some Saudi prince is pulling Charles' strings (as well as other things).

I wonder what Charles would say about Saudi's recent 200-lash sentence against a rape VICTIM. He refuses to visit Israel, but pals up with swine who brutalize rape victims.

What a piece of shit that guy is!

Posted by: Kevin M at November 16, 2007 08:44 AM


Tsk, tsk. I have long suspected that Charlie was a closet muzzy. Until WWI the royal family had little use for last names. Queen Victoria's husband, Prince Albert, was a member of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, so her descendants were part of that dynasty. This, however, was not the family's last name. They didn't have one. The lack of the royal family's official name became a problem during WWI, when King George V decided his family needed a new, English-sounding name, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha sounded too German, after considering every possible name, from Plantagenet, Witten, Tudor-Stuart to simply England. The king and his advisors chose the name Windsor. This would have been a real problem when Adolph was bombing Britain since they were blood relatives to Germans, French and Russians. The 1701 Act of Settlement, made it illegal for a Roman Catholic, or anyone married to a Roman Catholic, to inherit the throne. The leader of the Roman Catholic Church in England, pointed out that Prince William, "can marry by law a Hindu, a Buddhist, anyone, but not a Roman Catholic. I didn't see Jews mentioned but if Charlie supports the muzzies it automatically clarifies his anti-semitism stance. Hmm, Prince Charles's fixation on Islam also makes me wonder about the affair of Diana, Princess of Wales and her companion Dodi Fayed, and the muzzy connection there. Did both dissapoint Queen Elizabeth? I wonder if she feels the same way about Prince Charles as Lillian Carter did about her boys when she said, sometimes, when I look at my children, I say to myself, "Lillian, you should have remained a virgin." Be thankful this lizard turd only a titular head of state.

Posted by: Jack at November 16, 2007 01:32 PM


I'm disgusted with the royal family, especially after seeing the queen suck up to that saudi bastard. This is just the icing on the cake.

Posted by: rene at November 17, 2007 08:22 AM


Inbred, toothy douche nozzle!

Posted by: MCPO Airdale at November 19, 2007 02:28 PM